SENATE, No. 255
| By Ms. Creem, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate,
No 255) of Cynthia S. Creem , John P. Slattery, Pamela P Resor, Anne M.
Paulsen and other members of the General Court for legislation to require a
comprehensive assessment system for students, schools and districts.
Education, Arts and
Humanities |
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

In the Year Two Thousand and One.
AN ACT TO REQUIRE A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR
STUDENTS, SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in
General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1.
Chapter 15 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 1998 Official Edition, is
hereby amended by deleting section 55A and inserting in place thereof the
following:-
Section 55A.There shall be established an office of school fiscal auditing
and governance oversight, hereinafter referred to as the office, within the
department of education, but not subject to its control. The purpose of the
office shall be to audit the expenditure of all funds expended by any public
school or school district and compliance with all state and federal legal
requirements. The office shall have the power to require the officers of any
public school, howsoever chartered or organized, or school district to supply in
a timely manner any information determined by the office to be necessary to
carry out the foregoing responsibilities. Said officers shall convey the
requested information to the office with a signed statement to the effect that
the information is accurate and complete to the best of his or her ability.The
office shall be governed by a board of directors with one representative chosen
by each of the following state agencies:the department of education; the
department of revenue; the auditor of the commonwealth; the inspector general of
the commonwealth; and by one representative chosen by each of the following
organizations:the massachusetts association of school superintendents; the
massachusetts municipal association; the massachusetts association of school
committees; the massachusetts teachers association; the massachusetts federation
of teachers; the masssachusetts elementary schools principals association; the
massachusetts secondary schools administrators association; the massachusetts
association of regional schools; the massachusetts association of vocational
administrators; the massachusetts parent teacher association; and, the
massachusetts business alliance for education.
SECTION 2. The first paragraph of Section 1D of chapter 69 of the General
Laws, as appearing in the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding the
following sentence to the end thereof:-
Before taking effect, the standards shall be reviewed and approved by the
state affiliate of the professional association representing the academic
discipline, or their successors as the case may be, for each standard as
follows: in mathematics by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; in
English Language Arts by the National Council of Teachers of English, the
International Reading Association and the National Association of Bilingual
Educators; in science and technology by the National Association of Science
Teachers, the National Technology Education Association and the Association for
Career and Technical Education; in health by the National Association for
Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, the American School Counselors
Association and the National Association of School Psychologists; in the arts by
the National Art Education Association, the National Alliance for the Arts and
the National Music Educators Association; in social studies by the National
Council for the Social Studies, the National Council for History Education and
the National Geographic Alliance; and in foreign languages by the National
Foreign Language Association.
SECTION 3.The third paragraph of section 1E of chapter 69 of the General
Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the
end thereof:-
Before taking effect, the standards shall be reviewed and approved by the
state affiliate of the professional association representing the academic
discipline, or their successors as the case may be, for each standard as
follows: in mathematics by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; in
English Language Arts by the National Council of Teachers of English, the
International Reading Association and the National Association of Bilingual
Educators; in science and technology by the National Association of Science
Teachers, the National Technology Education Association and the Association for
Career and Technical Education; in health by the National Association for
Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, the American School Counselors
Association and the National Association of School Psychologists; in the arts by
the National Art Education Association, the National Alliance for the Arts and
the National Music Educators Association; in social studies by the National
Council for the Social Studies, the National Council for History Education and
the National Geographic Alliance; and in foreign languages by the National
Foreign Language Association.
SECTION 4. Section 1D of chapter 69 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is
hereby amended by adding after the word “determination” in line 54 the following
words:-
,according to the evaluation system established by the district or Commonwealth
charter school according to section one I of this chapter,
SECTION 5. Section 1D of chapter 69 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is
hereby amended by adding after the word “graduation” in line 59 the following
words:-
;provided however, that the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
(“MCAS”) test, so called, or other standardized test, shall not be a component
of the competency determination.
SECTION 6. Section 1I of chapter 69 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is
hereby amended by striking the first through fourth paragraphs, and inserting in
place thereof the following five paragraphs:-
Every ten years each public school, including a Commonwealth and a Horace
Mann charter school, shall take the steps necessary to become accredited by the
New England Association of Schools and Colleges, hereinafter referred to as
NEASC. The governing school district, if any, shall take all steps necessary to
assist each school in its district to achieve such accreditation. If, after four
years from the beginning of the accreditation process, a school fails to achieve
accreditation, fails to make significant progress toward accreditation or is
placed on probation status by the NEASC, the commissioner may initiate
proceedings pursuant to section one J of this chapter.
The commissioner may determine the priority order for schools to begin the
accreditation process and may use previous poor performance on the MCAS or lack
of improvement on the MCAS to require schools to be among the first schools to
begin the accreditation process.
Each school district shall develop and adopt a system for evaluating on an
annual basis the performance of both the district and individual public schools
within the district, including Horace Mann charter schools. Each Commonwealth
charter school shall develop and adopt a system for evaluating on an annual
basis the performance of the school.With respect to individual schools, the
system shall include instruments designed to assess the extent to which the
school and district have succeeded in improving or have failed to improve
student performance, as defined by student acquisition of the skills,
competencies and knowledge called for by the academic standards and embodied in
the curriculum frameworks established by the board pursuant to sections one D
and one E in the areas of mathematics, science and technology, history and
social science, English, foreign languages and the arts, as well as by other
gauges of student learning judged by the district to be relevant and meaningful
to students, parents, teachers, administrators, and taxpayers.
Each system shall be designed both to measure outcomes and results regarding
student performance, and to improve the effectiveness of curriculum and
instruction. In its design and application, each system shall strike a balance
among considerations of accuracy, fairness, expense and administration. Each
system shall employ a variety of assessment instruments on either a
comprehensive or statistically valid sampling basis. Such instruments shall be
criterion referenced, assessing whether students are meeting the academic
standards described in this chapter. As much as is practicable, especially in
the case of students whose performance is difficult to assess using conventional
methods, such instruments shall include consideration of work samples, projects
and portfolios, and shall facilitate authentic and direct gauges of student
performance. Each system shall be approved by the school committee, or by the
governing board of any school not under the direction and control of a school
committee, and shall meet the NEASC standards on assessment. Every school
district must submit a written summary of its proposed assessment system to the
Department of Education for review prior to the implementation of said system.
In addition, each district or Commonwealth charter school shall, under
procedures and guidelines established by the department, administer the
following tests as part of its assessment system: the Iowa Test of Basic Skills
in Reading in Grade 3; a standardized statewide test, established by the
department, in English language arts every two years beginning in grade 5; a
standardized statewide test, established by the department, in mathematics every
two years beginning in grade 4; standardized end-of-course assessments,
established by the department, in history and social studies in grades 9 and 10;
standardized end-of-course assessments, established by the department, in
science in grades 9 and 10; and local assessments in foreign languages, arts and
health. Said tests and assessments shall be used only for purposes of diagnosis,
remediation, and assessment of the extent to which the school’s students have
acquired the skills, competencies and knowledge called for by the academic
standards and embodied in the curriculum frameworks established by the board
pursuant to sections one D and one E, and shall not be used to deny any student
graduation or any other benefit of public education. Test scores shall be
reported to each student and to his or her parents or guardians and shall be
reported in the aggregate at the school and district level.
Prior to the use of any state tests described in the previous paragraph, the
tests shall be reviewed and approved by the state affiliate of the professional
association representing the academic discipline, or their successors as the
case may be, for each test as follows: mathematics by the National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics; English Language Arts by the National Council of
Teachers of English, the International Reading Association and the National
Association of Bilingual Educators; science and technology by the National
Association of Science Teachers, the National Technology Education Association
and the Association for Career and Technical Education; health by the National
Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, the American
School Counselors Association and the National Association of School
Psychologists; arts by the National Art Education Association, the National
Alliance for the Arts and the National Music Educators Association; social
studies by the National Council for the Social Studies, the National Council for
History Education and the National Geographic Alliance; and foreign languages by
National Foreign Language Association.
Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, reporting by
the department of performance levels of the MCAS tests, so called, shall be by
numerical categories and shall not be by any qualitative description, such as
“advanced”, “proficient”, “needs improvement” or “failing”.
The department shall provide technical assistance to schools and school
districts to achieve the accreditation and implement the evaluation systems
required by this section, including the development of models for local
evaluation systems. The department shall fund all costs associated with
achieving and maintaining accreditation by the NEASC, including teacher reassign
time, substitute teachers and other staff participation costs associated with
the accreditation process, as well as all costs associated with the performance
evaluation systems required by this section.
SECTION 7. Section 1I of chapter 69 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is
hereby amended by inserting the following paragraph at the end thereof:-
Each public school, including a Commonwealth and a Horace Mann charter
school, shall annually report to the public how all its students have performed
under the assessment system established by the district, or by the school in the
case of a Commonwealth charter school. The report shall be in a uniform format
within each school district, or within the school in the case of a Commonwealth
charter school, and shall break down the data by race, gender, special education
or transitional bilingual education status and such other categories as the
district or school deems useful. The report shall include how each school’s
performance relates to its school improvement plan. The report shall also include
the school’s progress in obtaining or renewing accreditation by the NEASC.
SECTION 8. Chapter 69 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended
by striking section 1J and inserting in place thereof the following section:-
Section 1J. If, after four years from the beginning of the accreditation
process, a school fails to achieve accreditation required by section one D,
fails to make significant progress toward accreditation or is placed on
probation status by the NEASC, the commissioner may appoint an independent
fact-finding team to assess the reasons for the non-accreditation, failure to
make progress or probation status, and the prospects for improvement. Upon review
of the conclusions of the fact-finding team, the board may, according to
regulations established by the board, declare the school chronically
under-performing.
Upon a determination that a school is chronically under-performing, the
following steps may be taken:
(1) The principal of the school shall be immediately removed and shall not be
assigned to the school for the following school year unless the board finds that
the principal did not play a significant role in the under-performance of the
school;
(2) The superintendent may designate a new principal for the school;
(3) If the school does not receive funding from the district at least equal
to the average per pupil funding received for students of the same
classification and grade level in the district, the district shall provide
additional funding sufficient to bring funding for that school to such level;
(4) Such other actions determined by the board of education, to be reasonably
calculated to increase the number of students attending the school who satisfy
the student performance standards.
SECTION 9. Chapter 69 of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby
amended by striking section 1K and inserting in place thereof the following
section:-
Section 1K. If, after four years from the beginning of the accreditation
process, more than one-third of the schools in a district fail to achieve
accreditation required by section 1D, fail to make significant progress toward
accreditation or are placed on probation status by the NEASC, the commissioner
shall appoint an independent fact-finding team to assess the reasons for the
non-accreditation, failure to make progress or probation status, and the
prospects for improvement. Upon review of the conclusions of the fact-finding
team, the board may, according to regulations established by the board, declare
the district chronically under-performing. Following such a declaration, the
board shall designate a receiver for the district with all the powers of the
superintendent and school committee or other applicable executive officer and
governing board. The receiver shall report directly to the commissioner. For
purposes of this section, the term “district” shall include a Commonwealth
charter school.
If a municipality has failed to fulfill its fiscal responsibilities to
education under chapter seventy, the commissioner shall recommend to the board
that the district be declared chronically under-performing. The municipality's
mayor or chairman of the board of selectmen shall have the opportunity to
present evidence to the board. A vote by the board that a school district is
chronically under-performing for fiscal reasons shall authorize the commissioner
to petition the commissioner of revenue to require an increase in funds for the
school district, alleging that the amount necessary in said community for the
support of public schools has not been included in the annual budget
appropriations. The commissioner of revenue shall determine the amount of any
deficiency pursuant to the sums required under chapter seventy, if any, and
issue an order compelling the community to provide a sum of money equal to such
deficiency. If the community does not provide a sum of money equal to such
deficiency, the commissioner of revenue, in accordance with his powers in
section twenty-three of chapter fifty-nine, shall not approve the tax rate of
the community for the fiscal year until the deficiency is alleviated.This
section shall not be construed to create a cause of action for educational
malpractice by students or their parents, guardians or persons acting as
parents.
SECTION 10. The Commissioner of Education shall select a panel of three
experts from out-of-state from a list of nationally qualified experts in
educational testing provided by the National Research Council of the National
Academy of Sciences, and two educators, one an elementary teacher and the other
a secondary school teacher, from a list of experienced teachers provided by the
Massachusetts Teachers Association and the Massachusetts Federation of Teachers,
to perform a study of the validity, reliability, quality and age and language
appropriateness of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System tests as
used in the public schools.
The Commissioner of Education shall enter into a contract on behalf of the
Department of Education, with the selected panel of experts to conduct such a
study. Said contract shall require that the study be completed no later than
December 31, 2001.The Commissioner and the Department of Education shall assist
the panel in obtaining all information, documents or other evidence necessary to
conduct the study.
The findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Commission shall be
presented to the Board of Education and to the Joint Committee on Education,
Arts and Humanities no later than March 1, 2002.
|