MassCARE

Excerpts from Testimony

 

Legislature’s Joint Committee on Education, Arts, and Humanities

Public Hearing on MCAS Bills on September 9, 2003

Quotations and Testimony from Parents, Teachers, Students, Administrators, Researchers, Testing Experts, and Elected Officials

 

Compiled by MassCARE, the Massachusetts Coalition for Authentic Reform in Education and the Alliance for High Standards, NOT High Stakes

 

“That even one child, much less thousands, fails to get an essential high school diploma even though he/she did everything else right in high school, is doing irreparable harm. One test – given no matter how many times – should not overrule 13 years of schooling and the judgment of all those who know him or her best…But the harm, in fact, is equally falling on all the kids who pass. It’s hardly a surprise that relentlessly giving the same test over and over – and relentlessly organizing schooling around testing – should produce a lift in scores. But it does not indicate whether we have more well-educated graduates.”

Deborah Meier

Headmaster, Mission Hill School, Boston                                                              Boston

 

“With the advent of the MCAS exam as a condition of high school graduation, Massachusetts has clearly turned back the clock on special education. This standardized paper-and-pencil test tends to emphasize a student’s limitations rather than building on his or her abilities…MCAS has failed abysmally to address the circumstances of students with disabilities. This test is destroying the aspirations of some of the Commonwealth’s hardest working students. Why are we placing insurmountable obstacles in the paths of our most vulnerable public school students? ‘One size does not fit all,’ and standardization is the antithesis of special education. If MCAS remains the barrier it has become for these children, then 25 years of progress will be reversed, and a high school diploma will become the ‘impossible dream.’” 

Ruth Kaplan

Member, Brookline School Committee

Co-Chair, Alliance for High Standards NOT High Stakes

phone: 617-566-4173, email: kaplanruth@aol.com                                              Brookline

 

“MCAS ‘pass’ rates do not take into account all the 7th and 8th and 9th and 10th graders who give up – who are disproportionately poor, of color, whose first language is not English. These children learn that they are failures at their first MCAS results and have that bitter knowledge hammered home with each additional round of testing. These are capable, smart, engaging children held to one measure of success, one class-biased strata of achievement – no matter what rich skills and interests and prior knowledge they bring to their own learning. Why should they persevere? Who cares if they drop out? They are among the thousands and thousands of the new “disappeared” – the state’s most vulnerable children, the ones education reform was touted to support.”

Meg Robbins, teacher

Co-Chair Hampshire County CARE

Northampton, Mass.

phone: 413-657-3506, email: megrobbins@comcast.net                                Northampton

 

“The state must replace its unfair, one-size-fits-all test with an alternative assessment system such as the one proposed by the Coalition for Authentic Reform in Education and the Massachusetts Teachers Association, and introduced by Sen. Creem. Such a system would include assessments that support teaching and learning, and would use multiple forms of evidence for making decisions about student and school progress.”

Monty Neill

Executive Director of the National Center for Fair and Open Testing (FairTest) phone: 617-864-4810, email: monty@fairtest.org                                              Cambridge

 

“The Governor, the Board of Education and you in the Legislature, continue to
hold children of the Commonwealth to the highest graduation standards in the
nation. This is unconscionable when you are retreating from providing the
resources necessary for local districts to create the circumstances that are
needed so that all children have a chance to meet that standard.”

Timothy T. Collins

President of the Springfield Education Association

phone: 413-782-8300, email: sea@javanet.com                                                 Springfield

 

“We need high-stakes resources and a commitment to sustain those resources and to bring about the kind of changes necessary so that all children can learn… What is in place to make sure that students will be able to pass this test next year and in the years to come? We are seeing budget cuts, increasing class sizes, huge cutbacks in funding for MCAS tutorials, elimination of libraries and other resources. How can you hold students accountable to a test in that environment? How can you hold them accountable for subject matter they have not even been taught?” 

Jean McGuire

Executive Director of METCO

Chair of MassCARE (Mass. Coalition for Authentic Reform in Education)

phone: 617427-1545, email: jmcguire@metcoinc.org                                               Boston

 

“My son has multiple learning disabilities and attends Landmark School. He struggles mightily, especially with math. I am not sure he will ever be able to do the math portion of MCAS. Yet he is a very gifted artist. I am concerned that one test will deny him the opportunity to receive a diploma and thus continue to art school to pursue his gift. If he was a privately paid student he could receive the Landmark diploma which is accepted by all universities and colleges. Landmark is currently fighting the DOE on their ruling that publicly funded students cannot receive the Landmark diploma if they do not pass MCAS, even though they have met Landmark’s well-established academic standards. Why are we punishing children for the minds they are born with instead of encouraging and supporting their gifts and strengths?”

Sarah L. Patton

Mother of special education student in Winchester

email: salrick@comcast.net                                                                                Winchester

 

 

“As an educator for over thirty years, I oppose the MCAS as a … requirement for graduation because it is bad educational practice…We need to engage our young people in a holistic learning process that enables them to contribute their gifts in manifold ways to enhance the quality of life of the broader community and meet the challenges of the 21st century…tests such as the MCAS undermine quality education based upon active processes of critical and creative inquiry and replace them with shallow exercises in rote memorization of disconnected bits of information…Secondly, I oppose the MCAS because it is unjust. It punishes students for the failure of schools, further exacerbates and legitimizes a society of winners and losers, and consigns the majority of urban students to the scrap heap of society. The MCAS has become a very effective sorting device to validate systemic processes of social and economic inequality.”

Mary Jo Hetzel, Ph.D.

Faculty Member, Springfield College, School of Human Services, Boston Campus

phone: 617-983-2741, email: Mary_Jo_Hetzel@spfldcol.edu                                  Boston

 

“On Sept. 3rd, the Department of Education announced the “extremely impressive” results of the 10th grade MCAS tests this spring. These results: only 25% of students in the class of 2003 (17,400 students) failed the test; only 48% of Blacks failed the tests (1,700 students); and only 56% of Latinos failed the tests (2,900 students). We now learn that the figures for Blacks and Latinos are greatly understated…If these results are “extremely impressive” it is difficult to imagine what figures would be less than impressive. While the Dept of Education is clear on what constitutes student failure, it seems somewhat less clear on what would constitute failure of the MCAS program, or of the DOE.”

Thomas R. Crowder, Newton

Public school parent and grandparent

Email: thomasrcrowder@yahoo.com                                                                        Newton

 

“The regulation (MCAS graduation requirement) is invalid for several reasons. It does not comport with the clear intent of the statute which was enacted a few days after and in consequence of the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in the McDuffy case which constitutionally mandated an adequate education for every child in the Commonwealth. The Board’s regulation completely ignores this mandate and ignores the carefully crafted conforming legislative mandate requiring multiple assessments of at least six subjects. The Board’s action amounts to defiance of you, the Legislature, by substituting, as unelected officials, its own views and ideas of what’s best for our children. This is democracy at its worst, and if you allow it to continue, you abandon your functions and duties as legislators… We elected you, not an appointed board, to represent us and we urge you to do so.”

Sumner Z. Kaplan

Former State Representative and retired Trial Court Judge

phone: 617-566-1381, email: SZK@aol.com                                                            Boston

 

"As an advocate I hear countless stories from parents on how schools refuse to provide special education services, refuse to evaluate kids for special ed services, fail to implement IEPs and refuse to provide access to the general curriculum.  One school gave an 8-year-old boy dot-to-dots instead of age appropriate math because it was easier for the staff. The Department of Education does not hold schools accountable for failing to provide needed services and a decent education for kids in special ed, yet they're quick to deny diplomas when our kids fail the MCAS. Why is DOE punishing our kids for the schools’ refusal to obey state and federal law?" 

Cathy Taylor

Advocate, Cape Organization for Rights of the Disabled (CORD)

Parent of a 15-year-old son in special education

email: ctaylor@cape.com                                                                                      Cape Cod

 

“The fact that state officials expressed happiness that “only” one quarter of the 10th graders now fail MCAS on the first try reveals a major flaw in their thinking: the premise that a single, one-size-fits-all test can discriminate passing from failing students would never be accepted in other walks of life. Would you go to a physician who offers only one test to determine your health? Would you accept a plumber with only one tool in his or her tool chest? Then why accept a single outcome test to determine whether a student can graduate from high school?”

David E. Krebs, DPT, PhD

Professor and Director, MGH Biomotion Laboratory

MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown Navy Yard

phone: 617-726-8016, email: krebs@helix.mgh.harvard.edu                           Charlestown

 

“Today, I will focus on one negative effect of the MCAS – how the MCAS limits many students’ access to higher education, keeps students from rewarding and higher-paying careers, and adversely affects the supply of skilled labor necessary for our economy… With the MCAS requirement in place, a significant number of Massachusetts high school seniors every year will not receive diplomas, even though they have great passion and potential for success in important vocational areas… (Many students who did not pass MCAS may attend community colleges with financial aid from the state, but must take MCAS remediation courses and not career-related courses.) … They struggled in some courses and on the MCAS, but stayed in school because they had their eyes on a goal. We are now reducing their education to only the areas in which they struggled, while taking away the areas that gave them motivation and goals.”

Bradford R. MacGowan, Ed.D

College and career counselor at Newton North High School

President-Elect of the New England Association for College Admission Counseling

phone: 978-256-2653, email: bmacgowan@comcast.net                   Newton / Chelmsford

 

“In my role as a professor of education, I have the opportunity to work with teachers K-8 every day I go to work. Without question, the overemphasis on standardized testing, and the MCAS in particular, has warped the curriculum in directions that can actually reduce effective teaching. When teachers see this sort of thing happen, they feel demoralized and disempowered… While there is much in education reform to be proud of, such as the development of curriculum frameworks and the creation of more opportunities for community involvement in the schools, the downside has been the misuse of standard test scores, the manipulation of results, pass score manipulation by politicians, and over-reliance on one instrument (the MCAS) over more authentic and personalized evaluations and assessments that ought to be at the core of academic decision-making.”

Charles W. Hetzel, Ph.D.

Professor of Education

Fitchburg, Massachusetts

email: charliehetzel@aol.com                                                                               Fitchburg

 

 

 

For more information, contact:

Jackie Dee King, MassCARE, 617-864-4810, jackie@fairtest.org 

Marilyn Segal, Citizens for Public Schools, 617-227-3000, marilyn@citizensforpublicschools.org 

 

 

 
 
Home ] Up ]